Practice English Reading Exercises for B2 – Technology’s Impact on Entertainment & Art

Reading » B2 English Reading Exercises » Technology’s Impact on Entertainment & Art – B2 English Reading Exercises

Exercises:   1234567

Reading 1

You are going to read a magazine article about a journalist who reviews a fully automated hotel.

For questions 1-6, choose the answer (A, B, C or D) which you think fits best according to the text.

The Glitch in the Machine

When my editor assigned me to review The Silicon Inn, an experimental, fully automated hotel in central Tokyo, I jumped at the chance. Advertised as a seamless glimpse into the future of hospitality, the establishment boasted a workforce consisting entirely of machines. Walking into the immaculate, brightly lit lobby, I felt like a character in a science fiction novel. Instead of a traditional receptionist, a sleek, humanoid robot with glowing blue eyes processed my booking, dropping a smooth black keycard into my palm. It was flawlessly efficient, and I was instantly captivated by the sheer novelty of the experience.

My room was equally impressive, resembling a luxury spaceship cabin rather than standard accommodation. Everything was controlled via a digital tablet: the heavy curtains glided open at a swipe, and a mechanical voice greeted me warmly, asking if I required any immediate assistance. To test the system, I ordered a complimentary coffee. Within minutes, a small, box-like robot rolled through a designated flap in the door, successfully delivering a steaming cup without spilling a single drop. Sitting on the plush bed, I mentally drafted a highly positive review, convinced that this spectacular automation was indeed the inevitable future of travel.

However, the illusion of perfection was abruptly shattered later that evening. I decided to pop down to the lobby to inspect the automated vending machines, wearing only my comfortable loungewear. Returning to my floor a few minutes later, I pressed my keycard against the electronic sensor on my door. Instead of the reassuring click of the lock, a red light flashed angrily, accompanied by a sharp buzzing sound. I tried wiping the card and pressing it firmly against the reader several more times, but the heavy door remained stubbornly shut. A sudden, uncomfortable realisation washed over me: I was completely locked out.

I wasn’t initially too concerned, assuming there would be a simple fix. I wandered the long, silent corridors, searching for a member of staff to manually override the system. It took me a good ten minutes to fully grasp the severity of my predicament. There wasn’t a single human employee in the entire building. My only company was a robotic vacuum cleaner that bumped gently against my ankles before spinning around and gliding away. A creeping sense of panic began to replace my earlier fascination. The spotless, quiet environment, which had seemed so relaxing earlier, suddenly felt incredibly isolating and unnerving.

Desperate, I located an interactive help screen near the elevators and initiated a video chat. I hoped to see a human manager, but instead, an animated digital avatar appeared. I anxiously explained my situation, but the program could only process basic, pre-programmed requests. In a frustrating display of artificial logic, it repeatedly offered to send fresh towels to the room I couldn’t enter. The sheer absurdity of the situation finally broke my panic, and I couldn’t help but laugh out loud at the unhelpful machine. Eventually, I had to locate a physical emergency telephone hidden behind a wall panel to wake up an off-site human technician, who remotely unlocked my door.

Back inside my room, I sat down and drastically revised my initial draft of the article. The Silicon Inn is undoubtedly an impressive feat of modern engineering, and when things run smoothly, it offers an undeniably unique experience. If I hadn’t experienced that frustrating ordeal, I would probably still believe that automation is completely flawless. Yet, my predicament highlighted a fundamental issue. Efficiency and precision are wonderful, but they cannot replace the basic human empathy required when things inevitably go wrong. I realised that while robots might be able to make a perfect cup of coffee, I would gladly trade them all for a friendly receptionist with a spare master key.

 

 What was the writer’s initial reaction to the hotel in the first paragraph?

     (A) He felt unnerved by the glowing blue eyes of the humanoid receptionist.

     (B) He was fascinated by the highly futuristic nature of the check-in process.

     (C) He was disappointed that the hotel was not as seamless as advertised.

     (D) He felt frustrated because he had to interact with a machine instead of a person.

2   How did the writer view the hotel’s technology after ordering a drink?

     (A) He was surprised that the delivery robot did not spill his coffee.

     (B) He believed it would quickly replace all human hotel staff in Tokyo.

     (C) He thought it was overly complicated compared to standard accommodation.

     (D) He felt certain it represented the direction the hospitality industry was heading.

3   What does the word ‘it’ refer to in paragraph 3?

     (A) the electronic sensor

     (B) the red light

     (C) the keycard

     (D) the heavy door

4   Why did the writer’s panic start to increase in the corridors?

     (A) He spent ten minutes trying to manually override the door system.

     (B) He realised there was nobody around who could understand his issue.

     (C) He was chased down the hallway by a robotic vacuum cleaner.

     (D) He felt extremely embarrassed about wandering around in his loungewear.

5   What caused the writer to laugh during the emergency?

     (A) The ridiculous response provided by the digital help system.

     (B) The fact that an animated avatar appeared on the screen.

     (C) The off-site technician’s funny reaction to his situation.

     (D) The thought of what his editor would say about his predicament.

 What conclusion does the writer draw at the end of the article?

     (A) Fully automated hotels will never be successful in the modern travel market.

     (B) The hotel should be avoided because its engineering is fundamentally flawed.

     (C) Technological perfection is not as valuable as human understanding during a crisis.

     (D) Robots are better suited to making coffee than managing building security systems.

Answer Key

1   B: The text states that the writer felt “like a character in a science fiction novel” and was “instantly captivated by the sheer novelty of the experience.” This paraphrases perfectly into being fascinated by the futuristic nature of the process. Option A is a False Match; he mentions the glowing blue eyes but was captivated, not unnerved. Option C is the Opposite. Option D is a False Match; he was happy to interact with the machine.

2   D: The writer states he was “convinced that this spectacular automation was indeed the inevitable future of travel.” This matches the idea that he felt it represented the direction the industry was heading. Option A is a Partial Truth; he notes the robot didn’t spill the coffee, but he wasn’t “surprised”—he was using it as proof of a successful system. Option B is an Over-inference. Option C is the Opposite of his feelings at that moment.

3   C: The pronoun ‘it’ refers to “my keycard”, which the writer was trying to wipe and press firmly against the electronic reader after the door refused to open.

4   B: The panic sets in because it took him ten minutes “to fully grasp the severity of my predicament. There wasn’t a single human employee in the entire building.” This means there was no one who could understand or resolve his issue. Option A is a False Match; he was searching for staff to override the system, not doing it himself. Option C is a False Match; the vacuum just “bumped gently” against him, it didn’t chase him. Option D is Unstated; while he was in loungewear, embarrassment is not mentioned as the cause of his panic.

5   A: The writer explains that the computer “repeatedly offered to send fresh towels to the room I couldn’t enter” and that the “sheer absurdity of the situation finally broke my panic, and I couldn’t help but laugh out loud”. Option B is a Partial Truth; the avatar appeared, but the response is what made him laugh. Option C is a False Match; the technician is mentioned later. Option D is Unstated.

6   C: In the final paragraph, the writer reflects that “Efficiency and precision are wonderful, but they cannot replace the basic human empathy required when things inevitably go wrong.” Option A is an Over-inference; he admits the hotel offers a “unique experience” when things run smoothly. Option B is the Opposite; he calls it an “impressive feat of modern engineering.” Option D is a Partial Truth trap; he mentions the coffee and the key, but misses the deeper global message about empathy.

Reading 2

You are going to read a magazine article about a person digitising old family videos.

For questions 1-6, choose the answer (A, B, C or D) which you think fits best according to the text.

Archiving Old VHS Tapes

I’ve always been a sentimental hoarder of memories, so when I stumbled upon a dusty cardboard box in my parents’ attic last month, I knew exactly what was inside. It contained dozens of old VHS tapes, their handwritten labels fading with age, bearing titles like ‘Summer Holiday 1994’ and ‘School Play’. However, my initial wave of nostalgia was quickly accompanied by a pressing sense of urgency. Magnetic tape naturally degrades over time, and experts warn that homemade footage from the 1980s and 90s is currently at high risk of being lost forever. If I had truly understood how fragile these cassettes were, I would have transferred them to a modern format years ago. I decided it was time to digitise my childhood before the memories literally crumbled to dust.

I purchased a budget video capture card online, borrowed a bulky VCR from a generous neighbour, and set up a makeshift archiving station on my dining table. Sliding the first cassette into the machine, I heard the familiar, satisfying clunk of the tape engaging. As the flickering image appeared on my laptop screen, I was instantly transported back to a sunny afternoon in 1995. There was my grandfather, who had passed away a decade ago, laughing loudly as he tried to put up a tent in our back garden. It was a profoundly moving experience. The picture quality was undeniably grainy, and the colours were severely washed out, but seeing his face again brought a wide, genuine smile to my face.

Just as I was relaxing into the viewing experience, disaster struck. The VCR suddenly emitted a horrifying screeching sound, followed by a series of aggressive mechanical clicks. Before I could even reach out to press the ‘stop’ button, the screen went completely black. My heart hammered against my ribs as I desperately hit the eject mechanism. The tape slowly emerged, but to my absolute horror, a long ribbon of glossy black film was hopelessly tangled inside the machine. When I gently tried to pull the cassette free, the delicate tape snapped in two. A sudden wave of frantic grief washed over me. I felt as though I had personally destroyed the only remaining evidence of my grandfather’s infectious laugh.

After a few minutes of mild panic, I realised that staring at the broken plastic wouldn’t fix the situation. I immediately turned to the internet for a solution and discovered several video tutorials demonstrating how to manually splice a snapped VHS tape. The procedure looked incredibly delicate, requiring the precision of a surgeon. Armed with a tiny screwdriver, some transparent tape, and a pair of scissors, I carefully dismantled the plastic casing. Smoothing out the crinkled edges of the film and perfectly aligning the two torn ends was a deeply nerve-wracking task. Overcoming this required absolute concentration and an incredibly steady hand, but I was stubbornly determined not to let my precious family history simply disappear into the bin.

Having successfully reassembled the cartridge, I took a long, shaky breath and fed it back into the VCR. I fully expected the temperamental machine to reject it, but the tape whirred into action. Suddenly, the image of my grandfather flickered back onto the screen, completely unaffected apart from a brief, momentary glitch where the cut had been made.

Tears of immense relief streamed down my cheeks as I watched the remainder of the video safely transfer to my hard drive. I realised that we often take our modern digital photos for granted because they are so easily duplicated and backed up in the cloud. However, holding that repaired cassette in my hands, I understood the unique value of analog history. While digital files are undeniably convenient, the sheer physical effort required to rescue that broken tape made the restored footage feel infinitely more precious. It was a stressful afternoon, but saving that piece of my past was worth every second of panic.

 

1   Why did the writer decide to digitise the tapes?

     (A) He wanted to clear out the dusty cardboard boxes from his parents’ attic.

     (B) He was worried that the physical recordings would soon become unplayable.

     (C) He had been advised by tech experts to share his 1980s footage online.

     (D) He regretted not watching his childhood videos for such a long time.

 How did the writer feel when he first started watching the footage?

     (A) disappointed by the poor, grainy visual quality of the video

     (B) amused by his own behaviour during a childhood summer holiday

     (C) deeply touched to see a moving image of a relative who had died

     (D) frustrated that the old VCR was making a strange clunking noise

 What can be inferred about the writer’s reaction when the tape snapped?

     (A) He blamed himself for the permanent loss of the recording.

     (B) He believed his neighbour had deliberately damaged the VCR.

     (C) He realised he had pressed the eject button too aggressively.

     (D) He was annoyed that he would have to buy a new capture card.

4   What does the word ‘this‘ refer to in paragraph 4?

     (A) the process of finding helpful tutorials on the internet

     (B) the grief of losing his grandfather’s laugh

     (C) the task of joining the broken pieces of tape together

     (D) the act of taking the plastic casing apart

5   What happened when the writer played the repaired tape?

     (A) The video played perfectly from beginning to end without any visual errors.

     (B) The VCR machine immediately rejected the reassembled cartridge.

     (C) The recording continued successfully after a minor visual interruption.

     (D) The audio was fully restored but the video remained a black screen.

6   What is the writer’s main message in the final paragraph?

     (A) Digital files are generally safer and more reliable than analog tapes.

     (B) The difficult process of saving the physical tape increased its emotional value.

     (C) People should avoid trying to repair complex electronic equipment themselves.

     (D) Analog formats provide significantly better picture quality than modern digital files.

Answer Key

1   (B): The text states that “Magnetic tape naturally degrades over time… homemade footage from the 1980s and 90s is currently at high risk of being lost forever,” prompting him to digitise them before they “crumbled to dust.” This matches being worried the recordings would become unplayable. Option A is a partial truth trap; he found them in the attic, but wasn’t clearing them out. Option C is a false match; experts warned about degradation, not sharing videos online. Option D is an unstated distractor.

2   (C): The writer saw his grandfather, who had “passed away a decade ago,” and describes it as a “profoundly moving experience” that brought a smile to his face. This matches being deeply touched to see a relative who had died. Option A is the opposite; he says the quality was grainy, but seeing the face brought a smile. Option B is a false match; he was watching his grandfather, not himself. Option D is a false match; the clunking noise was “satisfying,” not frustrating.

3   (A): In paragraph 3, the writer states, “I felt as though I had personally destroyed the only remaining evidence of my grandfather’s infectious laugh.” This strongly implies he blamed himself for the loss. Option B is an unstated over-inference about the neighbour. Option C assigns a false cause-and-effect; the tape snapped when he tried to pull it free, not because of the eject button itself. Option D is completely unmentioned.

4   (C): The pronoun ‘this’ refers directly to the previous sentence: “Smoothing out the crinkled edges of the film and perfectly aligning the two torn ends was a deeply nerve-wracking task.” Overcoming ‘this’ refers to the difficult task of joining the tape back together. Options A, B, and D refer to other actions and emotions in the text that do not fit the grammatical reference of the sentence.

5   (C): The text explicitly notes that the image flickered back onto the screen “completely unaffected apart from a brief, momentary glitch where the cut had been made.” This means it continued successfully after a minor visual interruption. Option A is incorrect because there was a glitch. Option B is the opposite of what happened; he expected it to be rejected, but it wasn’t. Option D is a false match.

6   (B): The writer reflects that “the sheer physical effort required to rescue that broken tape made the restored footage feel infinitely more precious.” This highlights how the struggle increased the emotional value of the memory. Option A is a partial truth; he admits they are convenient, but it’s not the main message. Option C contradicts his successful repair. Option D is false; he previously admitted the tape’s quality was “grainy” and “washed out.”

Reading 3

You are going to read a magazine article about a homeowner who is locked out of their automated house.

For questions 1-6, choose the answer (A, B, C or D) which you think fits best according to the text.

The Smart Home Gone Rogue

I had proudly considered myself a pioneer of the digital age. I had transformed my modest suburban house into a state-of-the-art ‘smart home’. Everything from the heating system to the kitchen lighting was controlled by a highly sophisticated network of sensors and a sleek application on my smartphone. Whenever I approached the driveway, GPS tracking would prompt the front door to unlock automatically, while my favourite playlist echoed softly from the hallway speakers. I felt an undeniable sense of superiority as I watched my neighbours fumbling with clunky metal keys in the pouring rain. I was convinced that maximum convenience was the secret to a stress-free life.

However, this blissful illusion of control was violently shattered one bitterly cold Tuesday evening in November. After enduring a gruelling ten-hour shift at the office, all I wanted was to step into my pre-warmed living room and collapse onto the sofa. As I walked heavily up the garden path, shivering in my thin coat, I waited for the familiar electronic chime that signalled the door unlocking. It never came. Frowning, I pulled out my smartphone to manually trigger the lock via the app, but my screen displayed a frustratingly vague error message. A severe local internet outage had entirely disconnected my home from the server, effectively turning my intelligent sanctuary into an impenetrable fortress.

The initial annoyance rapidly mutated into a wave of helpless rage. I stood on my own doorstep, pressing my palm against the frozen biometric scanner again and again, refusing to accept the reality of the situation. Without an internet connection, the high-tech system was entirely paralysed. I called the security helpline, but an automated voice simply advised me to restart my router—an incredibly unhelpful suggestion given it was safely locked inside. It felt as though the house itself was mocking me. If I had bothered to keep a traditional spare key, I wouldn’t have been standing outside in the freezing wind.

With no other options available, I realised I would have to break into my own property. The front and back doors were secured by heavy-duty smart locks, leaving the windows as my only potential entry point. I trudged through the muddy flowerbeds to the side of the house, inspecting the ground-floor windows. Fortunately, the small window in the utility room relied on a standard mechanical latch rather than a digital sensor. Finding a discarded piece of metal piping in the garden shed, I spent an exhausting forty minutes prying it open. The physical exertion was immense, leaving my hands blistered and my clothes covered in damp soil.

Eventually, I squeezed through the narrow gap and tumbled onto the tiled floor. Sitting in the pitch-black, freezing house—because, of course, the smart lighting and heating were also offline—the sheer absurdity of the situation finally hit me. I had invested a fortune in cutting-edge technology to make my life easier, yet a simple regional network failure had rendered it completely useless. The vulnerability of my setup was suddenly glaringly obvious. Technology is brilliant when it works, but without a reliable analogue backup, it becomes an enormous liability.

The very next morning, my first task wasn’t to reboot the router or complain to my internet provider. Instead, I drove straight to the local hardware store and had a traditional brass key cut for the back door. I also hired an electrician to install manual override switches for the essential lighting. I still use some of my smart devices for minor tasks, but my perspective has profoundly shifted. I no longer view mechanical keys and physical buttons as outdated relics of the past. Instead, I appreciate them as dependable, tangible tools that will never suddenly decide to lock me out.

 

1   How did the writer feel about his smart home setup originally?

     (A) He felt arrogant when comparing his situation to his neighbours.

     (B) He was anxious about the complexity of the digital network.

     (C) He felt annoyed when his favourite music played automatically.

     (D) He believed it would eventually replace traditional metal keys entirely.

2   How did the writer react when the door failed to unlock?

     (A) He blamed the freezing weather for damaging the door.

     (B) He was frustrated by a message he received on his phone.

     (C) He felt relieved that he could manually trigger the lock.

     (D) He was exhausted from walking heavily up the garden path.

3   Why was the security company’s advice useless to the writer?

     (A) The automated voice was too difficult to understand.

     (B) He was unable to reach the equipment he was told to adjust.

     (C) The security company refused to send a technician to help.

     (D) His high-tech system had been completely paralysed by the cold.

4   What does the word ‘it’ refer to in paragraph 4?

     (A) a piece of metal piping

     (B) a digital sensor

     (C) the small window

     (D) the garden shed

5   What realisation did the writer have while sitting in the dark room?

     (A) He needed to invest more money in a better heating system.

     (B) A smart system without a physical backup is a significant risk.

     (C) Smart lighting is generally more reliable than internet-connected locks.

     (D) He should have hired a professional to install the technology.

6   What is the writer’s main message in the final paragraph?

     (A) Homeowners should completely disconnect their houses from the internet.

     (B) Traditional mechanisms offer a sense of reliability that digital systems lack.

     (C) It is cheaper to use old-fashioned keys than to fix broken smart devices.

     (D) Hardware stores offer much better customer service than internet providers.

Answer Key

1   A: The text states that the writer felt “an undeniable sense of superiority as I watched my neighbours fumbling with clunky metal keys,” which paraphrases as feeling arrogant when comparing his situation to theirs. Option B is the opposite of how he felt. Option C is a false match; the music “echoed softly” and he enjoyed the convenience. Option D is an over-inference; while he loved his system, he didn’t explicitly state it would replace all keys globally.

2   B: The text mentions that when he tried to use his app, his “screen displayed a frustratingly vague error message.” Option A is a false cause; the internet outage locked him out, not weather damage. Option C is the opposite; he tried to trigger it manually via the app but failed. Option D is a partial truth; he was exhausted from a “ten-hour shift at the office,” not from walking up the path.

3   B: The automated voice advised him to restart his router, which was “an unhelpful suggestion given it was safely locked inside,” meaning he couldn’t reach the equipment. Option A is unstated. Option C is unstated; he only spoke to an automated voice. Option D is a false cause; the system was paralysed by the internet outage, not the cold temperatures.

4   C: The pronoun ‘it’ refers directly back to “the small window in the utility room.” The writer found a piece of piping and spent forty minutes “prying it open.”

5   B: The writer reflects that technology is brilliant, “but without a reliable analogue backup, it becomes an enormous liability.” This perfectly matches the idea that lacking a physical backup is a significant risk. Option A is a false match; he notes the heating was offline but doesn’t say he needs a new system. Option C is the opposite; the lighting was also completely offline. Option D is unstated in the text.

6   B: The writer concludes by stating he now appreciates mechanical keys and physical buttons as “dependable, tangible tools that will never suddenly decide to lock me out.” This demonstrates that traditional mechanisms offer reliability. Option A is too extreme; he says he still uses “smart devices for minor tasks.” Option C is unstated; cost is not the reason he went back to physical keys. Option D is a false match; he visited both places, but customer service is not compared.

Exercises:   1234567

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This